Motion: This House should ban cigarettes from the society
Opening Government
- Cigarettes contain many dangerous ingredients that can make body and health issues.
- Cigarettes can lead smokers to death.
- More than 500.000 people die every year because of smoke
- Human rights for passive smokers
Opening Opposition
- Human rights, people can choose whether they want to smoke or not, it's their choice.
- Denying human rights who depend on cigarettes will just make a worse problem
- The government can make a smoking-free area, and spots for smoking.
- The discomfort caused by active smokers can be reduced by providing areas for smokers.
Closing Government
- There's nothing positive someone can gain from smoking.
- Smoking area isn't effective.
- Smokers are not only one or two, but MANY.
- The most effective way is to prohibit smoke.
- Cigarettes can lead to financial risk.
- $ 1093 billion were used for cigarettes and medications caused by smoke. That can be used for any other more important purpose.
Closing Opposition
- Smoking area is effective if there's a punishment for people who break the rules, smoking in a smoking-free area.
- Strict rules and punishment.
- Smoking is indeed bad, but banning it will just make another problem because there are still many people who need and is depending on cigarettes.
- Ban the subject, not the object!
- Education regarding to how dangerous smoke is is way better and acceptable.
Motion: TH should support the death penalty for corruptors
Opening Government
- Corruptors are immoral
- They're criminals, should be punished as death
- Jailing doesn't affect them, they repeat.
- They take citizen's money for themselves
Opening Opposition
- The most fundamental human rights is the right to live
- Life isn't something we can take
- Death penalty isn't effective, proved that there are still many corruptors even after that death penalty had been applied.
Closing Government
- They destroy their own country and they don't care.
- People pay taxes and they, who doesn't deserve the money, just easily take it away for them.
- Killing them could stop them from stealing.
Closing Opposition
- Death as a penalty is not damaging.
- It can be manipulated easily as long as they have money.
- They wouldn't feel the suffering
- It means to take individual right
- They need to feel the suffer of people who they took their money from
- They need to feel guilty
